Mr Lee Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 :thumbsup: Am I reading this correctly, discrimination against gays and girly boys? What will be next? :signnvm: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_shor Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 :thumbsup: Am I reading this correctly, discrimination against gays and girly boys? What will be next? :signnvm: "Safe sex implies that copulation by anyone with anyone at anytime is already a terribly blighted view of what sex is meant to be," Pimentel said in a statement on Wednesday.Instead of "safe sex," the senator suggested the use of "responsible sex" in the bill."In short, the law should promote responsible sex, not safe sex; procreation, instead of reproduction and equal relations of women and men, not between or among artificially created gendersin matter of sex," he pointed out.http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/...le-not-safe-sex Hmmmm. He does make a point about the unwanted label. Some people do seem to believe that what happened is the childs fault instead of the parents. Maybe he doesn't care if the others have safe sex or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mik Posted August 20, 2009 Posted August 20, 2009 Why is the government making laws about sex? More nanny state intrusion into privacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_shor Posted August 20, 2009 Posted August 20, 2009 Why is the government making laws about sex? More nanny state intrusion into privacy.They want to be sure you are only using the authorized position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts