Death wish? Shabu?

Recommended Posts

OnMyWay
Posted
Posted

Left to go to a nearby hardware store this morning at 0750.  It is on the National Hwy in Olongapo.  300 meters from our gate, I encounter this.  Traffic is very fast and busy there at rush hour.  I pulled up behind her and honked.  Never even turned around.  I went another 500 meters and parked at the hardware store.  We watched as she approached and passed, almost getting hit a few times.  Completely oblivious to honking and yelling, she just kept sashaying along in the middle of the road, tossing her hair back and forth.  I don't know if she made it to the end of the day.

 

295715871_1187441791823887_1160552435577527672_n.jpg

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kingpin
Posted
Posted

At least she was wearing clothes, I've seen a few just walking around obliviously nude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BrettGC
Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, OnMyWay said:

Left to go to a nearby hardware store this morning at 0750.  It is on the National Hwy in Olongapo.  300 meters from our gate, I encounter this.  Traffic is very fast and busy there at rush hour.  I pulled up behind her and honked.  Never even turned around.  I went another 500 meters and parked at the hardware store.  We watched as she approached and passed, almost getting hit a few times.  Completely oblivious to honking and yelling, she just kept sashaying along in the middle of the road, tossing her hair back and forth.  I don't know if she made it to the end of the day.

295715871_1187441791823887_1160552435577527672_n.jpg

 

Not wasted away enough to be a dedicated shaboo addict.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JJReyes
Posted
Posted

There is no pedestrian pavement.  She can therefore walk anywhere.  Filipino logic applies in this situation.  Glad she is not talking on the phone with a boyfriend trying to dump her.  The risk then increases, and a motorist hits her.  It's the motorist's fault.  Again, Filipino logic applies because obviously the motorist must be richer to afford a vehicle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave Hounddriver
Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, JJReyes said:

Again, Filipino logic

BC, Canada has logic that is more insane than Filipino logic; possibly why I feel at home here.  They recently passed a law that cyclists are ALWAYS right.  In ANY incident between a bicycle and any other vehicle the other vehicle is automatically judged at fault.  It is yet to be determined if two bicycles collide head on and fall into a passing car if the car is responsible for both bikes.

By contrast, the pedestrian only has rights when on a legal sidewalk or a legal crosswalk.  Go figure.

  • Like 1
  • I'm Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OnMyWay
Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, JJReyes said:

There is no pedestrian pavement.  She can therefore walk anywhere.  Filipino logic applies in this situation.  Glad she is not talking on the phone with a boyfriend trying to dump her.  The risk then increases, and a motorist hits her.  It's the motorist's fault.  Again, Filipino logic applies because obviously the motorist must be richer to afford a vehicle.

Well, in this instance, not the case.  There actually is a good sidewalk on one side and a wide dirt area on the other side.  She walked a least a km in the middle of the 4 lane road where buses, trucks, cars often exceed 100 kph.  While she walked, she was tossing her hair in a flirting style, oblivious to the world around her.  She actually was fairly normal looking, clean, etc.  Not what my wife calls a "greasy" lady.  We have one of those in the same area who walks around half naked.

This is is plain old, out of her head, craziness.  

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hk blues
Posted
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Dave Hounddriver said:

BC, Canada has logic that is more insane than Filipino logic; possibly why I feel at home here.  They recently passed a law that cyclists are ALWAYS right.  In ANY incident between a bicycle and any other vehicle the other vehicle is automatically judged at fault.  It is yet to be determined if two bicycles collide head on and fall into a passing car if the car is responsible for both bikes.

By contrast, the pedestrian only has rights when on a legal sidewalk or a legal crosswalk.  Go figure.

Not only in Canada - in the UK the new rules give priority to the "weakest" vehicle so a bus gives in to a car which in turn gives in to a motorcycle which in turn gives in to a bicycle.  

Edited by hk blues
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viking
Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, hk blues said:

Not only in Canada - in the UK the new rules give priority to the "weakest" vehicle so a bus gives in to a car which in turn gives in to a motorcycle which in turn gives in to a bicycle.  

That is quite the contrary to the Philippines I suppose 😂

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OnMyWay
Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Viking said:

That is quite the contrary to the Philippines I suppose 😂

I'm not sure if the video I posted shows it (I have the original longer version) but busses speed past her like she is just a fly that might go splat on their window.  Not much, if any, slowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Onemore52
Posted
Posted

The rule out here in the province is "Who dares wins"

I Reckon the good old Aussie Roo bar would fit right in here, especially the type that encases the whole car.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...