Canadian Citizen Killed In Surigao City

[jamesmusslewhite]

This was added by a member here but on another forum thread which I started the same night I started this tread. It is a mirror thread on the same subject which I have regarlly upgraded with new information. I felt this was a worthy information relivant to this sbject, so I am adding it here. Thank you Lee, I hope you do not mind me posting it here.

 

 

09/02/2014 12:20 PM

VANCOUVER - Canada can now easily strip the citizenship of millions of Canadians, thanks to a proposed law that will make citizenship harder to get and easier to lose.

 

The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA) is very worried about the implications of bill C-24, a proposal that re-defines Canadian citizenship.

They believe it targets naturalized citizens and those holding dual citizenship.

 

"Canadian citizens who are dual citizens are particularly vulnerable to the citizenship-stripping provisions because under the law if you only hold one citizenship then they can't take that away from you," said Carmen Cheung, senior counsel of BCCLA.

 

Cheung further explained, "But if you hold two citizenships, a dual citizenship or if you are even eligible for dual citizenship, then all of these citizenship-stripping provisions come into effect and so that in effect creates categories of Canadians and we know that oftentimes, the people who are dual citizens are immigrants or they're new to Canada, and so it disproportionately impacts new Canadians and immigrants."

 

It also targets suspects of terrorist activities, organized crime, or loyalty offenses, like serving in a country fighting Canada, by stripping them of their citizenship.

The new law also makes it harder to be a Canadian by extending the residency requirement from three years to four years with a minimum 183 days' stay in Canada per year in four out of six years.

 

An application can be denied if there is doubt in your "intent to reside" in Canada. Refused applications can no longer be appealed. READ MORE

[jamesmusslewhite]

Update: Harry Doyle Murder Trial 9/29/2014

Today was a hearing for the Harry Doyle murder case. The Prosecution put one of their prime witnesses, working student Edelyn Diadula on the stand today. She was there at the Palma Resort in Punta Bilar Surigao City and witnessed firsthand the August 12 murder of Canadian businessman Harry Doyle. Atty. Alfonso S. Casurra questioned Miss. Edelyn Diadula as to what she observed that afternoon before and during the shooting event. She stated that she was one of the guests at a birthday party for the mother of Mr. Martlaw Orquina and arrived at the resort around noon. Mr. Martlaw Orquina also a witness for the prosecution took the stand during the last hearing which I posted after the last hearing date. Miss. Edelyn Diadula said that when she got to the resort that three men were already there. Alfonso S. Casurra then asked her if she could remember how the three men she observed were dressed? She replied one man (Jerome Devocion) was wearing a brown green tee shirt and shorts, and the other two men (Jeffery and Johnny Parian) were both wearing black jackets and long pants. Atty Casurra than asked if the the two men wearing black jackets and long pants had their faces masked” Miss. Diadula said, “no sir, only ball caps and one had a striped scarf aruond his neck. Atty. Casurra asked if she could identify the three men? She responded, “yes”. She was then asked by Atty. Alfonso S. Casurra if any of the three men she observed at the resort that day were in the court room? She then replied, “yes” and when asked to point them out, she pointed to two detainees who were sitting in the court room. These two men were identified as Jerome Devocion and Jeffery Parian. The third suspect Johnny Parian was not in the courtroom because he is presently still at large but an arrest warrant has been issued. When later questioned how she knew the name of the three men? She explained that the day when she had given her statement she was shown two pages of color mudshots. That when she looked at the photos she identified Jeffery Parian in the photos and also identified the photos of Jeffery Parian and Johnny Parian and that it was that day when she learned of their names.  

When further questioned Miss. Edelyn Diadula said she later observed a SUV arrive containing a foreigner she named as “Harry Doyle”, a woman she saidn was “wearing a black blouse”, a woman she described as “a sexy lady” and several children. She then said that when they disembarked the SUV they occupied the bungalow to the right of the bungalow occupied by her party. Alfonso S. Casurra then asked how she knew that the foreigner was named Harry Doyle, and if she at the time knew the names of any of the other people that arrived.  Miss. Edelyn Diadula replied that the foreigner had walked over and introduced himself as Harry Doyle and that he had handed Mr. Martlaw Orquina a card with his name printed on it, but she did not know any of the other people who had arrived.

Alfonso S. Casurra asked her what she had observed after that? Miss Diadula said she observed the two Parian brothers and the “sexy woman” (Harry’s new secretary) taking together outside the back fence of the resort. Later Harry Doyle took off his shirt and entered the water. That while in the water the two Parian brother entered the water fully cloth still wearing black jackets and appeared to be trying to get close to Harry Doyle but chose to return to shore. She said that she later saw the two brothers laying on their backs on large rocks, that she saw a pistol in the waistline of Jeffery Parian, at that time she  replied that she thought it was a play gun. Later she saw Jerome Divocion talking to the woman wearing a black blouse (Jane Doyle) and they left together in the SUV, and that shortly they returned and Jerome Devocion was carrying a case of beer from the SUV. That Harry Doyle took one of the bottles from the case and sat down drinking beer and reading a newspaper. That shortly after she saw the two Parian brothers approach the bungalow and that Jerome Devocion then handed them some casaba. She said this seem to have angered Harry Doyle and he told the two Parian brothers, “get out!” and began to push against the Parian brothers. She said that she then saw both men pull pistols from their waistlines and aimed them at Harry Doyle who raised up his hands. Miss Diadula then said she heard the woman with the black blouse (Jane Doyle) yell, “Ajaw diri, Ajaw diri!” (“Not here, Not here!). That the men started shooting Harry Doyle. Miss. Diadula said that there was much blood. She also said that when the shooting started she saw the woman wearing the black blouse (Jane Doyle) running towards the bungalow that Miss.Diadula was occupying. Atty. Casurra asked Miss Diadula to stand up and demonstrate exactly how Harry Doyle had raised his hands. She the stood up and raised her hand head-level with palms facing forward. Miss. Diadula said that she ran to cover but she saw the two Parian brothers run out the front of the resort and that they jumped on motorcycles and left. Atty. Casurra showed her a copy of her Statement and asked if she recognized the document and if she recognized the signature. She said, "yes" and that the signature on the document was her's.  

There was not time left today for a proper cross-examination to be conducted so Miss. Diadula is scheduled to return again tomorrow morning so that defense attorney representing Jerome Devocion and the defense attorney representing Jeffery Parian to conduct their cross-examination of Miss. Diadula.

Side Note:
Jerome Devocion was also scheduled for a second hearing this morning at the court for the Arson case involving Miss. Kima (Harry Doyle’s Former Secretary). There was not enough time today so that hearing will be rescheduled for a later date.

Side Note:
I received a text from Mr. Martlaw Orquina this evening as I was typing this article. Today after the hearing Miss. Diadula, Atty. Casurra, myself and my wife were exiting the courtroom today and apparently someone took a photo of all of the four of us standing together while we were waiting for Atty. Casurra’s vehicle to be pulled around. We all left together and we dropped off Miss. Diadula before we returned to Atty. Casurra’s office. Later this afternoon two unknown men were in the neighborhood of Miss Diadula’s family showing this photo and asking where Miss. Diadula could be found. PNP investigators PO2 Anthony Miole and SPO3 Rosemarie Alamazan were called and she has now been relocated and is presently under heavy security. I can only presume that they are also using the same photo seeking my whereabouts as well. I wish I had a copy of that photo so I could have it for myself and so could post it here and on facebook. Even trials are "More fun in the Philippines." 

Edited September 29, 2014 by jamesmusslewhite

[HarryBeatMeAtTennis]

Thanks for the Update James

Sounds like it's coming together 

The side-note is a bit chilling

have good luck

[Methersgate]

Do be careful, James.

 

Thank you for the update 

[Steve & Myrlita]

Yes Jim be careful. It sounds like they plan to "Eliminate" the problem.

[Thomas]

Miss Diadula then said she heard the woman with the black blouse (Jane Doyle) yell, “Ajaw diri, Ajaw diri!” (“Not here, Not here!).

I see that as a proof Jane Doyle has to be guilty, or why would she yell like that otherwice...?

Or can it mean other than what the article say?

[jamesmusslewhite]

 

Miss Diadula then said she heard the woman with the black blouse (Jane Doyle) yell, “Ajaw diri, Ajaw diri!” (“Not here, Not here!).

I see that as a proof Jane Doyle has to be guilty, or why would she yell like that otherwice...?

Or can it mean other than what the article say?

 

 

I have asked that myself since I first heard this. When the Doyle sisters travled here to Surigao City back in 2012 to formally file the charges againt Jane Doyle, they had a gathering of Atty Casurra and all the PNP investigators, witnesses and security team for a evening meal. It was at this gathering that I first met the witnesses who were there at the Punta Bilar resort when Harry was murdered. I was sitting across from Joan and Ann Doyle and heard Miss. Edelyn Diadula tell the Doyle sisters what she had both seen and heard. There were two things which both are in her Witness Statement and public record. She said that as the two shooters pulled her weapons Jane Doyle yelled "Not here, Not here!" and also later as Harry was laying on the ground awaiting the EMTs to arrive, she heard Jane Doyle place a call to her lawyer requesting  a copy of Harry Doyle's new Will.

 

Every since that night I have pondered more times than I can count in deep contemplation trying to reason any possible need for her to yell "Not here, Not here!" which wound not seem neferious in nature. I could see "No No!", ""Stop Stop!", "Please No!", "Please Stop!", "Of My God!" or a "Help Help!" but to yell "Not here, Not here!"? Just seems such an odd thing to have yelled.

Edited September 30, 2014 by jamesmusslewhite

[Methersgate]

 

Miss Diadula then said she heard the woman with the black blouse (Jane Doyle) yell, “Ajaw diri, Ajaw diri!” (“Not here, Not here!).

I see that as a proof Jane Doyle has to be guilty, or why would she yell like that otherwise.?

Or can it mean other than what the article say?

 

 

She will deny having said that, of course, but it does seem a particularly stupid thing to say.

[Steve & Myrlita]

Not Here. Not Here....Sounds like an admission of conspiracy at the very least if not, the one who gave the original orders.

[i am bob]

I forgot to mention this earlier...  Last month I drove out to Nova Scotia to see my children and grandchildren before I head to the Philippines...  And I spent a night in Fredericton where Jane is staying in Canada.   I asked the desk clerk at the first hotel what she thought of what was going on and i was kicked out of the hotel.  No recourse - gone.  So I asked at the next hotel the same question.  No reply - just dirty looks.  I wish I knew what they were thinking.

 

:unsure:  :mocking: